Jon Chait calls our attention to Robert Draper’s piece in the New York Times Magazine this week about Priorities USA Action, a Democratic super PAC run by Bill Burton and Sean Sweeney. Here’s a lovely little excerpt:

Burton and his colleagues spent the early months of 2012 trying out the pitch that Romney was the most far-right presidential candidate since Barry Goldwater. It fell flat. The public did not view Romney as an extremist. For example, when Priorities informed a focus group that Romney supported the Ryan budget plan — and thus championed “ending Medicare as we know it” — while also advocating tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, the respondents simply refused to believe any politician would do such a thing.

via Nobody Takes Conservative Wingnuttery at Face Value | Mother Jones.

After countless debates and arguments about politics, I have certainly found this strange phenomenon to be true. I know plenty of people who are smart, sane, and relatively well-informed who simply refuse to believe that some of the crazy extremist stuff that comes from Republican mouths are FOR REAL.

Take for example, Ron Paul lovers. Most of these guys that I know are really cool, into self-sufficiency and personal accountability, and really love Paul’s libertarian message. I, too, like that part of his message. Where I get off the Paul train is when he says that free markets and business can regulate themselves without government interference. No, they can’t. Time and time again they have proven that rampant and unchecked capitalism leads to massive inequality and abuses of power. Period. I also think that we should take care of our own-the sick, the disabled, children, and the elderly deserve protection. Also, somehow in Paul’s philosophy, he condones invasive intrusion into a woman’s autonomy by opposing her right to choose, even in cases of incest and rape. When I point out this strange and seemingly contradictory stance to Paulites, they often say that this is just a talking point that he espouses to gain popularity. Really? He wants to end all wars, get rid of nearly all government agencies and THIS is his concession? It’s nonsensical. 

Perhaps Paul isn’t the best example, however, since his anti-war stance has left him dead in the water. So many mainstream Republicans, including Mitt Romney, are running on the platform of cutting costs mainly on the backs of the poor. Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc., are all on the chopping block. This is backed up by actual legislation and budget proposals put forth by Paul Ryan and others. It is in black and white and enshrined on video forever. Somehow, the elderly and many of the poor don’t seem to see how that pertains to them and their way of life. I often scoff and tell myself these people are just stupid idiots and completely deserving of whatever befalls them for not being an informed electorate, but bleeding-heart that I am, can’t muster enough scorn to truly embrace that cruel opinion. 

Many Republican friends and family members think that Romney and other candidates say these things to get elected. They must play “to the base.” I would love it if “the base” included the sane members of the electorate. Most people I know, whether conservative or liberal, are actually somewhat in the middle on most issues. No one likes unchecked debt and most support some fiscal responsibility and budgeting. Most people don’t really care if it’s Adam and Eve or Adam and Steve. Most people support a woman’s right to choose what’s best for her own body, though we prefer she not be either a baby machine or use abortion as birth control. 

If the base includes only the far right or left of the parties, we get something like the Tea Party-driven agenda that plagues us all. Since their ideologically ridiculous platform drove the narrative during the last election, we have seen the fruits of their wingnuttery blossom all over the country. Suddenly, police officers, firefighters and teachers are seen as moochers. Personhood amendments are threatening to make miscarriages illegal. Voter suppression measures are cropping up across the nation. Aid to the poor and hungry is facing draconian cutbacks.

I would for balance include a far-left example of this, but I’m failing to come up with an equivalent to the tea party’s influence on mainstream politics. Yes, we have Occupy, but so far there’s no corresponding change in public policy that I can see. Also, I just don’t see Occupy as unhinged leftists. Advocating banking regulation doesn’t seem very anarchist to me. But, I am willing to concede bias.

“The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference, and undernourishment.” – Robert M. Hutchins

The point is, we do ourselves a disservice if we no longer take politicians at their word. If they SAY they are going to cut Medicare and privatize Social Security, we should not be interpreting this as a winking concession to the far-right that will never be actively implemented. Current events prove that extremism has had a huge effect on public policy. The fact that school vouchers are being used for fundamentalist schools that teach that the Loch Ness monster is real and that the earth is 6,000 years old is proof positive that hard-right agendas are coming to pass. Apathy and cynicism are going to destroy this country if we don’t demand more from our leaders. The very basic and most important of these demands is honesty.

6 thoughts on “Nobody Takes Conservative Wingnuttery at Face Value | Mother Jones

  1. This is a great article. I keep using the analogy from the movie “It’s a Wonderful Life.” If you recall, when George Bailey was not around fighting for the rights of hardworking citizens who were not rich – those teachers, firefighters, police – Bedford Falls became Potterville. This is the world Ron Paul would bring with the Libertarian Party. The haves would become unchecked Robber Barons. I am a firm believer in what Gandhi said, “A society’s greatness is measured in how it takes care of its less fortunate.” Having been in business for thirty two years, I can assure you of two givens – (1) businesses do not want regulation and (2) businesses need regulation. We need to remind people what is most important. I do agree we need to be better financial stewards with our tax dollars, but I also believe any dumb ass can get elected saying they will cut taxes. Right now, after we get over the economic crises (and we are slowly but surely), we need to increase taxes and reduce spending but in a thoughtful way. The math won’t work otherwise.

  2. Marvelously done. Like you I keep trying to find corresponding left wing idiocy and fail. When I post something on my Facebook wall though someone will always propose the left is just as bad. Example:

    I posted the recent incident in Arkansas with the Rodeo where a effigy of the POTUS was used as part of the clown show to great hilarity. My own wingnut brother defended this and used the analogy of the Game of Thrones where a prosthetic head that might have been George W. Bush was used on a pike on the wall. I pointed out the differences (was / might have been, sitting President / not, defended acts / apology).

    While this example isn’t directly politicians it is what our nation is coming to. It is what we are seeing in the make-up of the people. It is frightening.

  3. Interesting comment from Valentine. We have lost a sense of decorum in this country. Even George W. Bush deserved respect as the President. I think with the “yelling talking head shows” and the taunting in sports and among sports fans (and little league parents), have led us down a path that we can express violence or representations of violence toward a leader you did not vote for. Everything has become a game now and we need to get back to trying to solve issues.

  4. I remember this guy named Morton Downey Jr. had a TV talk show during which he would chain-smoke and berate guests with whom he disagreed, blowing smoke in their faces and towering over them with teeth bared. There were often physical altercations and verbal shouting matches between the guests. It was a shocking show. I remember watching it and being both horrified and fascinated. Seems like after that show, copycats like Limbaugh and Glenn Back capitalized on the same formula of disrespect and derision of people with opposite viewpoints. Now we have a 24-hour “news” network that makes Downey look like a lamb, though at least there’s no more blowing smoke. Shock-jocks are no longer confined to AM radio. People like Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, etc. are seen as “straight shooters.” Their brash styles are admired and emulated. It makes me sick, personally. I think it has changed the way people talk to each other, polarizing us to the point that no one wants to find middle ground. Politics is now like a reality TV show, giving a whole new meaning to the term “political theater.” This can be part of the reason why people just don’t believe that politicians mean what they say; we’re just watching an “unscripted drama.”

  5. I am with you. People who look for political counsel from Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and Olbermann for that matter, need to look for other sources.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s