Now that the zombie apocalypse appears to have calmed down, we have a different end-of-the-world situation to deal with. A study published in the science journal Nature this week finds that human activity is pushing Earth toward a planetary shift wherein “widespread social unrest, economic instability and loss of human life could result.”

According to paleoecologist Anthony Barnosky and his 21 co-authors, the human population is ecologically influencial enough to transform the planet into a state heretofore unknown in human experience. The study draws from more than 100 scientific papers looking at environmental tipping points and biological forecasting. The paper concludes that the global ecosystem:

… is approaching a planetary-scale critical transition as a result of human influence. The plausibility of a planetary-scale ‘tipping point’ highlights the need to improve biological forecasting by detecting early warning signs of critical transitions on global as well as local scales, and by detecting feedbacks that promote such transitions. It is also necessary to address root causes of how humans are forcing biological changes.

This study adds to the ever-growing pile of scientific evidence that humans are on path to destroy life on Earth as we know it unless we change our ways. A Wired article on the study noted that human activity currently covers 43 percent of land around the world, and affects double that amount. Humans use one-third of all available fresh water and harvest 20 percent of the planet’s net terrestrial production. As Wired points out, current extinction rates compare to that which occured during the demise of dinosaurs. The paper finds that we’re about 15 years away from reaching “critical threshold” if we continue our current rate of land use…

via Breaking: World Going to Hell in a Handbasket | Mother Jones.

4 thoughts on “Breaking: World Going to Hell in a Handbasket | Mother Jones

  1. I can’t like this post. As an environmental scientist I know about the facts of human intervention in Earth’s system. One question I like to ask to all people who also seem concerned: what should we do about it?
    Keep it up,

  2. Why do we continue on our merry way, with the nay sayers winning the day? We could replace most plastic, easily with Industrial Hemp – that is one fell swoop. We could go back to family farms and farmers markets easily rather than what we have today, while this wouldn’t entirely address food needs in the cities, it would go a long ways. We could, dammit invest in high speed rail and simply make cities ‘no drive zones’ force the issue.

    The ideas are already out there, we simply refuse to implement.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s